When people first face the stock market, they only see two buttons on the screen: a green one that read “BUY” and a red one with the label “SELL.” Thus, they conclude that they are dealing with a zero-sum game and that for someone to win, someone else has to lose that exact amount.

Luckily, we eventually found out that financial markets a more nuanced. In this article, I’ll briefly review the cases in which stock markets can be either negative, zero, or even positive-sum games.

If you want to know the short and concise answer, here you go:

**Whether or not the stock market is a zero-sum game depends on the time horizon. Since the S&P500 yielded an average yearly return of 10.7% since 1957, long-term investment is considered a positive-sum game. High-Frequency-Trading and Day Trading, on the other hand, are zero-sum games.**

Now that we’ve covered the short answer let’s get our hands dirty with the details!

Table of Contents

**Is the stock market a zero-sum game?**

**A zero-sum game is a situation where the sum of the gains and losses of all agents involved adds up to zero.**

Naturally, the stock market is more complicated than that. It is an ecosystem with different types of agents exchanging a broad range of financial assets.

If it were a game in which someone had to lose for someone else to win, the stock market would not be able to increase in value over time. For it to be a zero-sum game, it would require to either stay stagnant or periodically converge to a given value, which of course, is not the case.

The S&P 500 index has increased in value by roughly 10.7% annually since its introduction in 1957. This is a clear example that the stock market can be a positive-sum game. Although there are gains and losses over the short term, when we look at more extended periods, there is an increase in value.

But from where comes this added value? Since stocks represent ownership in a company, they are, on aggregate, positively correlated to the economy. Economic growth has a positive effect on financial markets, and this is reflected in companies paying dividends and increasing market capitalization.

However, there is a difference between long-term investing, intraday trading, and high-frequency trading.

**Long-term investing (positive-sum game)**

As previously mentioned, the stock market is not a zero-sum game in the long-run, since there is actual value creation. A stock market is a place for investments in businesses, investments that encourage them to grow. This translates to an increase in the valuation of that business, which leads to actual value creation and wealth addition in the stock market. When you buy a share of a company’s stock, you buy a percentage of equity.

For Example, the NIFTY (Indian Stocks) increased 2.4X during the 10 years between 2010 and 2020. We can find many other stocks with similar increases or even bigger ones. This proves that, in the long term, investing is a positive-sum game.

Imagine a phone manufacturer raising capital to fund a new product line. It chose to sell a total of 3 shares of company stock to 3 investors (1 share/investor) @ $5 / share.

By efficiently assigning these newly raised $15, the company launched the new product, which turned out to be a huge success. Due to the successful product, the company is now valued at a much higher price, not only because of its cash flow but also because of its future growth potential. To keep things simple and unrealistic, let’s assume the market capitalization of the company values, leading to each share being worth $10.

Every investor benefited from this new product launch. There were no investors who lost, and each agent made a profit of $5/share. This is a clear example of a positive-sum game.

We chose this hypothetical scenario to be a happy one, but it could very well have been a sad one: if the new product flopped, everyone would have lost: the new investors, the founders, and perhaps even the few clients who chose to buy the product. This would be a negative-sum game, and the sum of the total allocated resources is greater than the value created.

**Intraday Trading (zero-sum game)**

The stock market becomes a zero-sum game when we engage in short-term trading. A perfect example of these situations is when trading options contracts in particular or most derivatives in general. An options contract is an investment that allows you to buy or sell financial security within a time window. Options contracts can be either:

**Call Option (or BUY**): gives the right to buy financial security for a specific price within a specified period of time.

**Put Option (or SELL)**: gives the right to sell financial security for a specific price within a specified period of time.

It is very important to understand that option contracts do not represent direct investments into companies. Without going into too much detail, their value depends on multiple factors, such as the underlying asset price.

In these markets, the profits (losses) of one party perfectly mirror the losses (profits) of their counterparty. In fact, if we account for brokerage commissions and exchange fees, the agreement between both parties becomes a negative-sum game.

**High-Frequency Trading (zero-sum game)**

High-frequency trading also referred to as HFT, is a method of trading that uses computer programs and highly efficient algorithms to execute orders with as little latency as possible. Current state-of-the-art HFT algorithms can execute a trade under 40 microseconds (0.00004 seconds). The traders with the most powerful computers and with the fastest execution speeds are more profitable than traders with less powerful calculators and with slower execution speeds.

Due to the nature of these algorithms, they operate at a time horizon where no notion of intrinsic value is relevant. They improve liquidity and reduce the bid-ask spread. Despite that, it is considered to be a zero-sum game.

**What is a zero-sum game?**

A zero-sum game is a game where one participant’s profits are symmetrical to the other participant’s losses. In other words, the ownership of the resources might change, but no additional value is generated.

Consider the game of *Poker*, in which the total money in the pot only exchanges hands. The profits of one player are precisely equal to the losses of all the remaining people on the table.

We can also encounter negative-sum games, in which the total of losses is greater than the total of wins, and positive-sum games, which are situations in which everyone wins (a win-win situation) or situations in which the total of wins is greater than the total of losses.

**Examples of zero-sum games**

It is a situation in which the total value at stake remains the same.

- A coin toss between two players. Player A and player B each flip a coin. If the coins land on the same face, player A takes the coins. If the coins land on different faces, player B takes both coins.

- Selling of damaged goods. If a seller offers a broken (and worthless) product to an unsuspecting buyer, the seller earns the asked price, and the buyer loses since he does not get anything of value in return.

**Examples of positive-sum games**

- Assuming a diversified portfolio, long-term investing is a positive-sum game on average.
- The cooperative behaviors between companies, nations, or even between different species of animals is also a positive-sum game.
- Consider two countries with very different climates, where one has perfect conditions to grow apples and the other carrots. Instead of suboptimally growing both products, they could specialize in growing the one they have a comparative advantage. David Ricardo, an economist from the 18th century, took this situation a step further and showed that this is advantageous even if one of the countries does not have an absolute advantage, but only a relative one.

**Examples of negative-sum games**

A negative-sum game is a situation that destroys value, at least partially. It doesn’t necessarily mean that everyone losses, but the sum of the losses exceed the sum of the profits.

- Armed conflict can usually be thought of as a negative-sum game. Even if a side gains ownership of some disputed resource, the total value at stake decreases if we account for lost lives and destroyed capital.
- Legal disputes can be a negative-sum game if both parties have to pay legal costs.
- If we consider gamblers, most casino games and sports betting are negative-sum games.

## 2 Responses

The total stock market capitalization is more than $44 trillion dollars. This is the total current value of outstanding issued stock. Each of these shares of stock were bought and sold by a buyer and seller. Each of these current shares of stock are listed in stock trading accounts belonging to the buyer and seller of the stock. Each stock trading account may have multiple stocks listed in the account ledger. Each of these stock trading accounts show a net win or net loss at the end of a trading day. If all accounts were settled at the end of a given day, the net winnings could only come from one place: the net losers pockets. That makes the stock market a zero-sum game over the short or long term. When analyzing whether the stock market is a zero-sum game, it is imperative not to look at “individual” stock trades to understand the true nature of the stock market. A proper and correct analysis must only examine “stock trading accounts” in the collective whole. So, who pays for the $44 trillion dollars if all accounts were settled on a given day. The correct answer is the collective net losers of each stock trading account. The collective net losers pay for all outstanding stock. Net losers pay for all share capital in the primary market and all net winnings in the secondary market.

Interesting take. Still, in the long run, it is by no means a zero-sum game. If one person buys a stock that increases in price over the next years, the seller is not losing. The sellers cash holdings remain constant, whereas the buyers holdings increase in value. Hence, the definition of a positive sum game.